It is clear that the many proposals made by Pro Bruxsel in recent years have been heard by several major parties (EU), both before the regional elections of 2009 before the election Federal 2010. So when Bruxsel Pro has released its study on the refinancing of our region, we found that our two main ideas, that of a refinancing through the perception of the PPI on the workplace and that of a congestion charge has hit home. The Greens have also quickly followed with a symposium on the same congestion. When
2010 we are launching the idea of changing federal cohesion model based on Belgium tomorrow's 4 Regions, rather than two antagonistic communities, key stakeholders and the media begin to ignore us.
Only dropper that the idea percolates, the first having seized the ball - but can be had he ever imagined by himself, we do not seek to have the monopoly Good ideas - Karl-Heinz Lambertz, president of the speaking community, talk about a speaking community Belgian region would be well on its own. He has done it again in recent weeks by declaring openly in favor of a Belgium based on 4 regions.
We also learned that the Belgian Greens have announced plans to work more regularly hand in hand (even if they claim that it was always the case, the man in the street do not generally was very conscious ).
sp.a also knew the side, we must acknowledge the work of Johan Vande Lanotte, which, even if he continued to rely on a community model (presumably the political situation between parties Competitors Is not that mature enough to discuss a 'Copernican revolution (sic) that would shift the hub of communities to areas), we still have read his notes included advanced Brussels including a refinancing structural as well as the introduction of bilingual lists, a point of view we have defended in our last note there is institutional more than a year.
Gennez Carolina, chair of sp.a, for his part said: "Brussels should not be managed by two major communities but as a City-Region own community with skills for education and culture "(TRV, Panorama, 21/11/2010).
We have also noted that Mr. Gatz, the group leader VLD Flemish parliament has introduced an interesting proposal for Brussels-Capital, offering a "double vote" within the district BHV, a first voice for a list (or nominee) of the linguistic role of the voter, and a second for someone in the other language group. One way to make the two communities more attuned to one another within our Region.
But what about the release of Mr. Gosuin (MR-FDF), said that during a conversation Chat with readers of the newspaper Le Soir, on 8 February this: "I dream of four regions that each would recognize in them the law and the existence of their minorities. Flemish region, a bilingual Brussels, Walloon and a friendly germanophone all of the founding principles of Europe. .
Unfortunately, these pronouncements in favor of regions of Belgium are still too rare and isolated within the party who remain essentially community. We know that the two main Flemish parties, the NVA and CD & V, are viscerally communitarians and the majority opinion of the Flemish joins them. But the French are not left with the promotion of an area that includes speaking Walloons and Brussels. But Brussels wants and needs to be a region in itself and balanced relations with both the Flemish Region, the Walloon Region. Any reform of the state that does not take into account this reality is doomed to failure. Can men and women politicians in this country be more and more people become aware, and Pro Bruxsel follow this path.
0 comments:
Post a Comment