duidelijk dat het een groot IS aantal voorstellen, gemaakt door Pro Bruxsel ins loop van de afgelopen jaren, zijn gehoord door several large EU parties, both for the regional elections of 2009 and for the federal elections of 2010. When
Pro Bruxsel her study on the refinancing of our region has taken out, we noticed that our two powerful ideas, namely the refinancing through the collection of personal income in the place of work and on an urban pricing, "wings" have been.
The Greens have also very quickly followed by a symposium on the urban pricing.
When we suggested the idea in 2010 to Belgium tomorrow for switching to a federal cohesion model based on four regions instead of two opposing communities were us by the key players and media avoided.
It's a drip, the idea gradually begins to flow through, the first that the ball picks up, maybe he had also been previously proposed, we find absolutely no monopoly on good ideas - is Karl Heinz Lambertz, Prime of the German community. He talks about a German community who would like to see themselves as a fully fledged region. He has in recent weeks redone by openly speaking in favor of a Belgium based on four regions. While his colleague had Paasch mainly noted for his statement "No, it is not always the Flemings who are the bad." For information, Paasch Pro DG for the party, which, we must say, all sympathy Pro Bruxsel can count.
We also noted that the Belgian Greens have announced more regular cooperation hand in hand - would like to work (even if they claim that this always was the case, the man or woman of the street turned it not very aware).
Also along the side of the sp.a we work Johan Vande Lanotte to praise, even if it still remained in a "community model" (the political situation between the competing parties has apparently not evolved enough to debate about a "Copernican revolution" that would move the center of the communities to the regions). We still have to read his notes contained a progress for Brussels-Capital, including a structural refinancing and the introduction of bilingual lists, a position that we have defended in our last letter of institutional over one year ago.
We should also mention that Mr. Gatz, the chairman of OpenVLD in the Flemish parliament, has made an interesting proposal for the Brussels-Capital, he proposes a "double sufrage" for emergency response in the district, with a first vote for a list ( or a candidate) according to the language role of the voter, and half vote for someone from the other language group. One way the two communities in our region closer together to listen.
But what about the statement of Mr. Gosuin (MR-FDF), which, during a "chat" conversation with the readers of the newspaper Le Soir on February 8, wrote: "I dream of four regions that together would recognize their existence and the existence of their minorities. A Flemish region, a bilingual Brussels region, one Walloon and one German, all with respect for the principles of Europe.
Unfortunately these attitudes in favor of one of Belgium's regions too much away, and isolated in the EU parties, all remain.
We know that the two main Flemish parties, and CD & V NVA, visceral Community and that the majority opinion of the Flemish joins. But the French-speakers would not be outdone, the promotion of a French-speaking Wallonia and Brussels area that encompasses.
But Brussels wants and has a fully fledged region that maintain balanced relations with both the Flemish and the Walloon Region.
Any state that ignores this reality will lead to a failure.
That ladies and gentlemen from the politics of this country may be in the growing number are aware of this and follow this road Pro Bruxsel.
Pro Bruxsel her study on the refinancing of our region has taken out, we noticed that our two powerful ideas, namely the refinancing through the collection of personal income in the place of work and on an urban pricing, "wings" have been.
The Greens have also very quickly followed by a symposium on the urban pricing.
When we suggested the idea in 2010 to Belgium tomorrow for switching to a federal cohesion model based on four regions instead of two opposing communities were us by the key players and media avoided.
It's a drip, the idea gradually begins to flow through, the first that the ball picks up, maybe he had also been previously proposed, we find absolutely no monopoly on good ideas - is Karl Heinz Lambertz, Prime of the German community. He talks about a German community who would like to see themselves as a fully fledged region. He has in recent weeks redone by openly speaking in favor of a Belgium based on four regions. While his colleague had Paasch mainly noted for his statement "No, it is not always the Flemings who are the bad." For information, Paasch Pro DG for the party, which, we must say, all sympathy Pro Bruxsel can count.
We also noted that the Belgian Greens have announced more regular cooperation hand in hand - would like to work (even if they claim that this always was the case, the man or woman of the street turned it not very aware).
Also along the side of the sp.a we work Johan Vande Lanotte to praise, even if it still remained in a "community model" (the political situation between the competing parties has apparently not evolved enough to debate about a "Copernican revolution" that would move the center of the communities to the regions). We still have to read his notes contained a progress for Brussels-Capital, including a structural refinancing and the introduction of bilingual lists, a position that we have defended in our last letter of institutional over one year ago.
We should also mention that Mr. Gatz, the chairman of OpenVLD in the Flemish parliament, has made an interesting proposal for the Brussels-Capital, he proposes a "double sufrage" for emergency response in the district, with a first vote for a list ( or a candidate) according to the language role of the voter, and half vote for someone from the other language group. One way the two communities in our region closer together to listen.
But what about the statement of Mr. Gosuin (MR-FDF), which, during a "chat" conversation with the readers of the newspaper Le Soir on February 8, wrote: "I dream of four regions that together would recognize their existence and the existence of their minorities. A Flemish region, a bilingual Brussels region, one Walloon and one German, all with respect for the principles of Europe.
Unfortunately these attitudes in favor of one of Belgium's regions too much away, and isolated in the EU parties, all remain.
We know that the two main Flemish parties, and CD & V NVA, visceral Community and that the majority opinion of the Flemish joins. But the French-speakers would not be outdone, the promotion of a French-speaking Wallonia and Brussels area that encompasses.
But Brussels wants and has a fully fledged region that maintain balanced relations with both the Flemish and the Walloon Region.
Any state that ignores this reality will lead to a failure.
That ladies and gentlemen from the politics of this country may be in the growing number are aware of this and follow this road Pro Bruxsel.
0 comments:
Post a Comment