by Alain Maskens
The francophone parties really do not understand.
The facts cry out: the organization of the Belgian political system based primarily on a community language, the operation is still blocking most of the state. Since the elections of June 2007: 1325 days without a federal project.
On 23 January, the cry of the street was equally deafening antagonism Community and endless blockades must cease.
KVS At January 21, artists have also sung, screamed, danced, written in Flemish and French: Cultural feeds interbreeding and solidarity grows a culture.
Yet during that time ... MR, PS, Ecolo and HRC announce a major new powwow purely French: "The French will think again about their common space." To this end, they will install on January 25 a "commission Wallonia Brussels, attended by four members of each of these four parties. Unlike the commission created in 2007 for the same purpose, no member of civil society was invited to be a member.
But: if a project Wallonia Brussels "What about 50% of Brussels whose mother tongue is not French? What about the Germanophones? The working group could be included, for example, two Dutch parliamentarians in Brussels and a member of the speaking Community?
case to appease the linguistic nationalism of a part of Flanders, so why play the same set of linguistic decline?
case to avoid co-management from Brussels through Flanders, why not waive the co-management of the French Community in Brussels ...?
case to create a project innovative, why exclude civil society, only able to offer a different perspective?
In fact, and this episode illustrates once again the major political actors, both French and Dutch, were shut up é s in a dual-monocommunautaire crippling. They seem unaware that in real life, the family, work, culture, language homogeneity is increasingly the exception. They will therefore never the ability to innovate, to imagine institutions outside the system which is now deadlocked over urgent than ever.
Certainly they are the elect of the nation - but at no time voters had a choice between a Belgium-based antagonisms language or a Belgium-based Regions together. This crucial question: is there a Belgian project based on two competing Communities or Regions who each take their diversity, this issue was not addressed in the last election debates. Normal: they have directed that the parties in power, all communitarized in a separate electoral system in two too. Similarly, this issue is absent from the major debates and editorials Sunday.
This debate would it be taboo?
Only parties young people born in the abundance of cultural diversity, can offer a radically different approach, adapted for Europe of the 21st century.
is the rationale for Pro Bruxsel institutional project and its "one country, four regions in solidarity" ( http://www.probruxsel.be/index.php?option=com_content&task = view & id = 35 & Itemid = 73 ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment